Monday, September 22, 2008

"catastrophic failure of Republican governance"

Ugh, sickening:
Bush has been the most successful president for the aristocracy in American history. He opened up the federal treasury to his rich friends, and they looted it like a Bagdad museum for nearly eight long years. Now that it's been stripped bare to the point that its going to cost trillions to even stabilize the thing, the Village has decided it's time to sober up and stop all this profligate spending. How convenient.

This is very similar to the arguments that were made 16 years ago when once again the establishment decided that the bill for Republican malfeasance would come due during a Democratic administration, thus foreclosing the possibility of solving many of the long term systemic problems that plague ordinary Americans. Heads they win, tails you lose. It's quite a racket.

But, at the very least, can we hear no more from Republicans about fiscal responsibility? Is it too much to ask that every time they say such a thing, that every opponent gets right in their face and starts yelling about Bush and Cheney and the catastrophic failure of Republican governance? I suppose it is. But until they do that, over and over again, the Republicans will be allowed to spend the country into oblivion, reward their rich friends with all your hard earned money and then morph into fiscal scolds the minute the Democrats take power, thus denying the people any sort of normal first world safety net. That's the pattern and it looks to me as if it's highly likely to replay itself once again unless the Democrats learn how to play this game.
Does anyone besides me find the concept of a "golden parachute" to be just as pornographic as it sounds? And not in a good way!

4 comments:

Ricky Bones said...

Something I thought about last night on the way home from work...

What if President Bush got his way and privatized social security? Wonder how this would have impacted that plan.

Makes you think!

Mike Thomas said...

I think we may be looking at this all wrong. For people who “hate” the government, this may be just the outcome that they desire. It destroys people’s faith and trust in the government and while they may be more mad at Republicans right now, they will be more suceptible to rightwing government bashing arguments in the future.
If a Democrat does manage to scratch and claw his way into office against the tidal wave of mass ignorance that blankets nearly half of the electorate, he will immediately be set upon by the rightwing noise machine and its mainstream media henchmen who will start blaming him for everything that has and will go wrong in the near future. And then in four years they will be able to scare people into electing another Republican and the cycle will start all over again. The only question is how long our country can survive against this kind of abuse.

AnnPW said...

Of course. That is what they have been doing for 40 years, at least. It's worth remembering too (regarding how long the country can last) that the Soviet Union collapse was NOT, as our rightwing friends love to fantisize, brought about by Ronald Reagan but by the internal meltdown of their economy, largely due to corruption and, yes, mismanagement. Hello???

I hate to be such a sourpuss pessimist, but: We are screwed. I seriously doubt that we are going to be able to recover from this.

Ricky Bones said...

Here is the biggest problem I see! The Hannity types, Sean especially, are telling the FOX sheep that the economy is in the best shape ever and we have economic growth like never before. Some buy it! Others aren't so sure and forget. BUT, if Obama gets in, IMMEDIATELY the economy will be Obama's problem, and if not turned around in 6 months, it will be his fault. That will be all the the FOX sheep will hear and remember.

Funny, Sean said that Bush inherited a bad economy from Clinton, yet when Clinton took the economy in a good direction after taking office, supposedly Reaganomics finally kicked in and Clinton took credit. What will he and the others say if Obama turns the economy around. I bet they will say, "It was President Bush's bold initiative before leaving office that got Obama the great economy, NOT Obama.

Makes me sick! Kind if like Rush saying that Obama is NOT black, he is actually Arab. Talk about contempt for your audience. So desperate that he insults his audience's intelligence.

OK, off my soap-box.